0:29
We are not talking about ancient Africa;
we are talking about modern Africa,
Africa that came out after 1885 Berlin conference
that also was very much shaped
by political developments
after the Second World War,
when a number of African countries
obtained their independence.
Africans at that time were
very much concerned with their unity.
Organization of African Unity
came to bring together independent states
preserving their political independence,
territorial integrity and also looking after
the welfare of their population.
Later it was succeeded by the African Union
taking over the same mission
that Organization of African Unity
have started, but African Union
also was somehow confronted
with a number of challenges,
some of which has to do
with the internal wars between states
and intra state conflicts,
some of it has to do also with the conditions
of economic development of the country.
So the concerns and challenges
were many but the African countries
are trying somehow to pull together,
defining African identity
and trying to play a role in world politics.
My questions to professor Badie
is the extent to which African leaders
have somehow managed to use
the grammar of world politics
and somehow to bring Africa
to the world stage.
2:04
Yes, this is a great problem.
I think that things were very easy
during the Cold war and the bipolarity
because the battlefield of the world
was located in Europe
and because we faced two main actors:
USSR and United States and,
even when the Third world was structuring
from the famous Bandung conference,
the Third world had to be related
to one camp or another.
If we take into account Bandung,
Nasser was behind USSR
and Pakistan for instance
was behind the USA.
Now this world is over
and you know in Europe,
I think that we made a great mistake
at that time that is to say 1989-1990,
because we thought that
with the end of the bipolarity,
we were starting a new era
which would be the multipolar world,
a multipolar era.
But this didn’t work.
That is to say behind polarisation
there is a very strong idea
which is the capacity of attracting
and if Europe expected
to be a pole in the world,
it has to be able to attract other countries
and to be one of the main actors in the world.
Now, there are no more main actors
– there are actors.
And this is in the meantime a chance
and a risk for Africa.
It is a chance because now Africa
can get emancipated
from all the traditional powers
because there is no ruling power in the world.
Neither USA who is more and more
cautious in its foreign policy,
neither Russia, neither even Europe.
And however, this capacity
to be one autonomous actor
is contradicted by another trend
and this other trend is very tragic
that is to say Africa is now the new,
one of the new battlefield of the world.
And the question is how Middle East,
which is the other battlefield in the world,
how Africa which is the second
or first battlefield in the world
can participate in governing the world
– and this is a little bit disappointing
because I think that the main failure
of all power is not to be able
to include new countries
in the global governance,
in the governance of the world.
After the colonisation, no new international institutions
were created except UNDP for instance.
But except UNDP, no change
in the charter of the United Nations.
United Nations was created by 51 members
now it is 193 and the charter is hardly modified
and of course no new agencies,
no new institutions were created.
So I will reply to your question
by another question: how can Africa
be an active partner in governing the world
if we have to admit that Europe
and all powers among which US
did not manage a room of autonomy
and participation of Africa
in governing the world?
I think this is an interesting question.
I think African leaders
have to put their acts together
and have to face both internal
and external challenges.
Internally they have actually to unite
the African states around
an African identity and African vision.
For projecting an African character
in the international world
- do you know that we have for example
East Africa community,
we have southern Africa, west Africa,
you have North Africa also.
This kind of subregional identities
emerging within Africa,
they could somehow contribute
to feed into the process
of an overall African role
which should actually strengthen
this but at the same time,
they have also these external challenges.
Now, for example, the concept
of international actors for the Africans,
in the past years, usually
because of the history of colonialism,
it was the European actors,
but now you have newcomers to Africa.
You have China, you have India also as well.
So Africa, as you rightly characterize,
aside for this novelty,
the China are investing heavily
for example in my own country,
in the Sudan, in Angola, in West Africa
and also the Russia is coming
also again coming a very role.
And also both of them are somehow trying
to impact on Africa
with different versions of development
of different versions of democracy,
for example we hear sometimes from East Asia,
Chinese led discourse on development
– development without democracy,
which somehow for some African autocrats,
that is a very kind
of attractive discourse to listen to.
But at the same time,
Africa is also a laboratory or even a field
for the new liberal economic policies,
for example championed by the IMF
and the World Bank in many countries.
Whether they have succeeded or not,
that is a question that we could deal
with another time, but again the Africans
have somehow to put together
an African perspective of development.
They could do that by drawing
their own indigenous knowledge
wisdom by also interacting fruitfully
with the discourses from outside.
I think the challenges are a tall order
for the African leaders: how to manage
this complex web of challenges,
both emanating from the internal situations
as well as those coming from the outside situation.
I think that we can conclude
10:24
But Africa is facing now
three grave problems:
first of all, the lack of human security,
that is to say food security
and health security.
The second point is the lack of employment
that is to say if you take
into account some African countries like Niger,
Niger has about 70% of his population
has less than 30 years.
What kind of jobs can we offer
to this people and so,
if they are not employed
they have an option, either to be a migrant
with all the risk and dangers
associated to migration,
or becoming maybe a child soldier.
And the third one is political,
that is to say how to promote democracy
and a working political system
as Africa counts probably
the highest number of failed state inside.
That is a problem.
But I am quite sure that of course
this is depending on the African willingness
but it is depending on the international order,
and I think that without a real cooperation,
no progress can be expected
on the front of human security.
Without a new economic order,
nothing can be expected about the new jobs.
And this is my last word:
without a real global governance,
not limited to old powers,
but really including without any kind of exclusion
by boycott or marginalization
but a real partnership,
I am sure that Africa will be
the continent of tomorrow.
Thank you professor, thank you