It’s called a practical guide, yet there’s a lot of theory and reading involved. I’m disappointed, I was expecting more examples

The course needs lot of situation based examples. The course is full of terminologies and it is difficult to make a connect.

Course offered little to no information that couldn't been found from Wikipedia. I was disappointed in it's poor quality.

Dated course and lecturers. all theory not case studies at all. Not a Silicon Valley style of course

Quite a dry and boring course. A lot of obvious content delivered in flowery language.

Course was very academic and not as practical as the title suggested.

Old school. Tests are not good at all. Review the assessments to not be a PubQuiz questions (name of people that create a theory, number of categories, etc). I did not feel engaged

Low production value, confusing questions, surface-level advice.

Lack of diverse voices and out-of-date references.

Boring and unengaging! Take it off my timeline.

General speaking that do not include any tools

Not a practical and very boring course.

It was not intrigueing or interactive.

too theoretical and boring

Not practical enough.